At the risk of alienating friends and family, including a man (Shawn) who I consider to be of utmost importance in my life, I will share a portion of my opinion on this matter.
No matter how many homosexuals I know, or how much I love them, I don't think I will ever be convinced that they should have the right to "marry" (though I wholeheartedly believe all Americans should be given equal rights, meaning benefits). I do not believe "marriage" should be prone to Constitutionality - where the concept of marriage can be extracted from its source and perverted for the sake of "equal rights". Marriage is a Biblical concept - a union of one man and one woman as outlined in Genesis 2:18-24:
"The Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a
helper suitable for him...
"...Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib He
had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
"The man said,
""This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called
'woman', for she was taken out of man.""
"For this reason, the man will leave
his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one
flesh."
Perhaps I'm guilty of over-quoting, but I think my friend Josh makes another valid point:
"Here’s the article… In response to "Gay Marriages" July 20, 2004 by Ken
Garcia."Give to Caesar What is Caesar's" "The
marriage institution should be a godly one." Amen, Ken. But, I would
like to challenge you Mr. Garcia in one respect. When Christ stood before
the Pharisees confronted by a different civic issue, taxation, he gave a
well-coined response, "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and unto God what is
God's." I have grown tired of late by various hijackings of Biblical
morality, especially as it concerns political and social matters.
Somewhere between the Declaration of Independence and the Christian
Coalition the defense of traditional values and Biblical values in particular,
has become annexed by various political platforms bellowing an historically
Christian ethic...but, the traditions of this historical Judeo-Christian ethos
seem, well, lost. Christ's own words are lost amidst the campaigning.
Gay marriage is a great starting place.
"Marriage is the union of a man and a woman" is an oft heard phrase now
adays, and for good reason. I tend to believe it’s true. But, in
agreement with you, Mr. Garcia, I tend also to believe that marriage is
specifically a godly institution, i.e., God ordains it. The State is not
and, much more importantly, must not be an authorizing force on issues of a
religious nature. Caesar does not ordain marriages, and hence he cannot
proclaim what is and is not considered a valid one. If society (and more
importantly, secular government) wants to implement an institution inherited
from religion, let it do so with all enthusiasm.
Hopefully, society will look at the institution of Christian
Marriage and not see divorce, spousal and child abuse, endemic unfaithfulness,
and hence be swayed by the content of the institution's character and godly
example. In the absence of such an example, however, and an overwhelming
desire to emulate, it might be a more "historical" and “traditional” virtue for
the Christian to look toward statements of repentance and grace for those not
swayed by the "traditional" offer. That is, grace rather than throw the
stones we disguise as quotation marks which identify the “spouses” we do not
think "godly" or "legitimate". Is the State concerned with godly
institutions, or with tax codes and medical benefits? All that being said,
the moment secular government begins to claim the authority to define words they
in fact borrowed from religion in the first place, my fear factor has to
increase, if only slightly. The early Christians
went willingly to their deaths over a steadfast commitment not to bow to the
powers and gods of Rome. Today, we have new powers and gods, most
prominent among them is the belief that secular society can save itself.
Not only is this categorically "ungodly", it is a form of idolatry and
blasphemy, to be at the very least resisted by Christians. I do not need
secular government (nor does God for that matter) to tell me that marriage is
the union between a man and a woman. I do not need secular government to
support my beliefs and convictions in what I take to be divinely revealed.
These foundational commitments already have the support of God...He made
them. Rather, I would give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and refrain from
giving over to Caesar (as if he even had a say in it in the first place) what is
and forever will be God's. The Constitution will
not save social morality, nor will our elected officials and their presumed
notions of justice and equity. That is the role of the Church, the role of
families, the role of individuals as examples. Let us not falsely elevate
to the level of the Constitution, what was from the beginning on an eminently
higher plane. The Taliban proscribes religion, the US Constitution freely
allows and offers it. By all means, let’s discuss the State and social
ethics. By all means, let’s discuss the family and personal morality.
But give to Caesar what is his, and do not abdicate to him what is your
gift to share in love."